|
Attention » History of the study of Attention
1850's to 1920's:
In James' time, the only method available to study attention was introspection.
Very little progress was made in quantifying the study of attention, though
it was considered a major field of intellectual inquiry by such diverse
authors as Sigmund Freud, Walter Benjamin, and Max Nordau. For example,
one major debate in this period was whether it was possible to attend
to two things at once (split attention). Some thinkers felt that they
were unable to do so, and other thinkers felt that they could. Without
experiments, it was impossible to settle the debate.
1920's to 1950's:
From the 1920s to the 1950s, the field of attention was relatively inactive.
The dominant psychological paradigm at the time was Behaviorism. This
view was strongly opposed to anything cognitive, partially as a reaction
to the endless debates of the introspectivists. Thus there were still
no tools for quantitative measurements.
1950's to present:
In the 1950s, the cognitive revolution began, and psychologists renewed
their interest in attention. Cherry and Broadbent, among others, performed
experiments on dichotic listening. In a typical experiment, subjects would
listen to two streams of words in different ears of a set of headphones,
and selectively attend to one stream. After the task, the experimenter
would ask the subjects questions about the content of the unattended stream.
During this period, the major debate was between early-selection models
and late-selection models. In the early selection models, attention shuts
down processing in the unattended ear before the mind can analyze its
semantic content. In the late selection models, the content in both ears
is analyzed semantically, but the words in the unattended ear cannot access
consciousness. This debate has still not been resolved.
In the 1960s, Anne Treisman began developping the highly influential
Feature integration theory (first published under this name in 1980 when
it became famous in a paper with G. Gelade). According to this model,
attention is responsible for binding different features into consciously
experienced wholes. Although this model has received much criticism, it
is still widely accepted or held up with modifications as in Jeremy Wolfe's
visual search paradigm.
In the 1960s, Robert Wurtz at the NIH began recording eletrical signals
from the brains of macaque monkeys who were trained to perform attentional
tasks. These experiments showed for the first time that there was a direct
neural correlate of a mental process (namely, enhanced firing in the superior
colliculus).
In the 1990s, neuroscientists began using fMRI to image the brain in
attentive tasks. The results of these experiments have shown a broad agreement
with the psychophysical and monkey literature.
|